The Question of Data
The data origin question must be answered
So where did all this data come from? Now that the science is done and we understand the cell's basic workings, we can see that Someone or something must have been a pretty good programmer. Who or what created the elaborate "cell program" in the first place?
A closed system
A cell only has reading heads for DNA, and no write heads unlike your computer that can read or write data. A cell cannot add information to the DNA - there are no structures to do so. This is called is a closed system. A cell can replicate its existing data and itself to make the real-life things we observe like plants, trees, fish, birds, mammals, elephants, and whales, but it all begins with one cell running the correct code, just like the software used to view this page right now! The cell and DNA code are interdependent and cannot exist without the other. Clearly, natural selection does operate, but uses pre-existing code. This is a design feature, not an accident! Although mistakes may develop, new code is never added. Actually Darwin thought information could be acquired within a generation and passed on. We now know this is in error, or otherwise evolution would have been proven 30 years ago when equipment became available to view cell operation. No such bio-equipment exists in a cell. Either way intelligence would need to be involved!
The data origin question must be answered
So where did all this data come from? Now that the science is done and we understand the cell's basic workings, we can see that Someone or something must have been a pretty good programmer. Who or what created the elaborate "cell program" in the first place?
A closed system
A cell only has reading heads for DNA, and no write heads unlike your computer that can read or write data. A cell cannot add information to the DNA - there are no structures to do so. This is called is a closed system. A cell can replicate its existing data and itself to make the real-life things we observe like plants, trees, fish, birds, mammals, elephants, and whales, but it all begins with one cell running the correct code, just like the software used to view this page right now! The cell and DNA code are interdependent and cannot exist without the other. Clearly, natural selection does operate, but uses pre-existing code. This is a design feature, not an accident! Although mistakes may develop, new code is never added. Actually Darwin thought information could be acquired within a generation and passed on. We now know this is in error, or otherwise evolution would have been proven 30 years ago when equipment became available to view cell operation. No such bio-equipment exists in a cell. Either way intelligence would need to be involved!
Mistakes don’t equal improvements
If you depended on 'mistakes' to update your software, (as evolutionists now claim happen in the DNA), no matter how many lifetimes you waited, would you believe Windows '7' could become Windows '10'? No, we all agree that would be impossible; code work requires planning and logic written into a progressive and convergent working system. Software doesn’t add good code by operating over on over in experience, we know it actually tends to "crash", not improve, like mistakes accumulating over time degrading DNA, not improving it as we see in reality. (see Evolution Falsified I - Genesis Alive! where 40,000 generations of fruit fly's exposed to many environments failed to produce useful mutations!) This is true in living systems also, reproduction over many generations adds 'mistakes' to genes, not positive features. (in humans over 120/generatiom) A well known geneticist, Ayala, postulated that due to this 'genetic load', humans may only live 300 generation's (about 10,000 years) before a complete breakdown would occur in our genes and our species fail. Remember, it’s the same code language and "hardware" (the cell) across all living things, from Algae to Man, so how can this all survive millions or even billions of years old as evolutionists claim? Could it be the Earth and life have been in existence for a far shorter time than evolutionists tell us? See the Time topic in this series for more The Question of Time - Genesis Alive!
For instance, if man lived on earth at conservative population growth rates, more than 10x24th people would have existed in earth, but that's more bones than the entire Universe could hold! Most uniform estimates indicate our planet is less than 10,000 years old. The recent finding of T-Rex in soft body with intact blood cells is very supportive of a young and vibrant time-frame of Earth and Creation, not an unimportant tick of some billion year clock. You are special and important to God!
If you depended on 'mistakes' to update your software, (as evolutionists now claim happen in the DNA), no matter how many lifetimes you waited, would you believe Windows '7' could become Windows '10'? No, we all agree that would be impossible; code work requires planning and logic written into a progressive and convergent working system. Software doesn’t add good code by operating over on over in experience, we know it actually tends to "crash", not improve, like mistakes accumulating over time degrading DNA, not improving it as we see in reality. (see Evolution Falsified I - Genesis Alive! where 40,000 generations of fruit fly's exposed to many environments failed to produce useful mutations!) This is true in living systems also, reproduction over many generations adds 'mistakes' to genes, not positive features. (in humans over 120/generatiom) A well known geneticist, Ayala, postulated that due to this 'genetic load', humans may only live 300 generation's (about 10,000 years) before a complete breakdown would occur in our genes and our species fail. Remember, it’s the same code language and "hardware" (the cell) across all living things, from Algae to Man, so how can this all survive millions or even billions of years old as evolutionists claim? Could it be the Earth and life have been in existence for a far shorter time than evolutionists tell us? See the Time topic in this series for more The Question of Time - Genesis Alive!
For instance, if man lived on earth at conservative population growth rates, more than 10x24th people would have existed in earth, but that's more bones than the entire Universe could hold! Most uniform estimates indicate our planet is less than 10,000 years old. The recent finding of T-Rex in soft body with intact blood cells is very supportive of a young and vibrant time-frame of Earth and Creation, not an unimportant tick of some billion year clock. You are special and important to God!
Variation within species
Creatures become more dominant in order to survive by using variations in size, color, etc., but these adaptations are already built into the DNA code of one animal kind. This is not the same as creating another complete kind of creature from the environment. In addition, as the DNA sits within a cell as an independent operating entity (and has been so changeless, since the since the beginning of biological time), then how can chemical to cell evolution explain this? How could DNA and the cell factory it controls evolved in identical paths and maintained a communication convention, and a very elaborate one at that, and still be functional for life to move forward in common decent reproduce? (Opposite sex mates must have accidentally evolved at the same time)! This concordant interrelationship and lack of cell mechanism for it prohibit anything ever evolving. The truth is the life kinds, like the dog type for instance, had a purer code with more variation range that distributed into the various dog kinds we see today. That's not evolution, that's good planning and design!
If the cell and DNA were a product of dead chemicals and time, wouldn't it make sense that cells should be evolving and changing too? Fact is, they haven't!
The truth is this unchanging interrelationship is absolute and proven at the most basic understanding of cell operation. How could ALL life be based on ONE code system if evolution is driven by random self-directed nothingness, changes and millions of mutations? That's a completely absurd notion. If evolution was at work, we should see thousands of code types and varied mechanisms, but the fact is we only see ONE. Now that the microscopes are bigger and the new science is in, the evolution foundations are cracking up fast.
More bad news for mutation theory; an important 2013 study found even more complexity in DNA; markers were identified along the DNA strand that act as sign posts for along the DNA strand, used when the cell calls up data code as needed, similar to the way your hard-drive accesses files on differing segments of the memory banks. This capability really makes DNA "3 Dimensional" the study states. (1) The more we look into cell operation with all the technology man can muster, we see more complexity and no possibility of life's self-creation or by mindless action. So if you were driving down a road and saw sign posts, would you deduct intelligence was missing from the area? No.
1. The genome’s 3D structure shapes how genes are expressed — Garvan Institute
What now, Duon's? a second control code (e.g."dual") overlapping the primary construction code?
"Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, scientists have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins. UW scientists were stunned to discover that genomes use the genetic code to write two separate languages. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled. One language is written on top of the other, which is why the second language remained hidden for so long." “For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said Stamatoyannopoulos. “Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture. These new findings highlight that DNA is an incredibly powerful information storage device, which nature (?) has fully exploited in unexpected ways.”(1)
So what we have here is a MAC/MS like super code thats been made by a billion years of accidents. Really? Even the utterly committed evolutionist's were "stunned". Is any more need said about the complexity of the DNA and the cell? Intelligence + Design acting on matter = Life. Defense rests.
1. Genome Uses Two Languages Simultaneously; Try That Yourself Sometime, Why Don't You - Evolution News & Views
Creatures become more dominant in order to survive by using variations in size, color, etc., but these adaptations are already built into the DNA code of one animal kind. This is not the same as creating another complete kind of creature from the environment. In addition, as the DNA sits within a cell as an independent operating entity (and has been so changeless, since the since the beginning of biological time), then how can chemical to cell evolution explain this? How could DNA and the cell factory it controls evolved in identical paths and maintained a communication convention, and a very elaborate one at that, and still be functional for life to move forward in common decent reproduce? (Opposite sex mates must have accidentally evolved at the same time)! This concordant interrelationship and lack of cell mechanism for it prohibit anything ever evolving. The truth is the life kinds, like the dog type for instance, had a purer code with more variation range that distributed into the various dog kinds we see today. That's not evolution, that's good planning and design!
If the cell and DNA were a product of dead chemicals and time, wouldn't it make sense that cells should be evolving and changing too? Fact is, they haven't!
The truth is this unchanging interrelationship is absolute and proven at the most basic understanding of cell operation. How could ALL life be based on ONE code system if evolution is driven by random self-directed nothingness, changes and millions of mutations? That's a completely absurd notion. If evolution was at work, we should see thousands of code types and varied mechanisms, but the fact is we only see ONE. Now that the microscopes are bigger and the new science is in, the evolution foundations are cracking up fast.
More bad news for mutation theory; an important 2013 study found even more complexity in DNA; markers were identified along the DNA strand that act as sign posts for along the DNA strand, used when the cell calls up data code as needed, similar to the way your hard-drive accesses files on differing segments of the memory banks. This capability really makes DNA "3 Dimensional" the study states. (1) The more we look into cell operation with all the technology man can muster, we see more complexity and no possibility of life's self-creation or by mindless action. So if you were driving down a road and saw sign posts, would you deduct intelligence was missing from the area? No.
1. The genome’s 3D structure shapes how genes are expressed — Garvan Institute
What now, Duon's? a second control code (e.g."dual") overlapping the primary construction code?
"Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, scientists have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins. UW scientists were stunned to discover that genomes use the genetic code to write two separate languages. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled. One language is written on top of the other, which is why the second language remained hidden for so long." “For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said Stamatoyannopoulos. “Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture. These new findings highlight that DNA is an incredibly powerful information storage device, which nature (?) has fully exploited in unexpected ways.”(1)
So what we have here is a MAC/MS like super code thats been made by a billion years of accidents. Really? Even the utterly committed evolutionist's were "stunned". Is any more need said about the complexity of the DNA and the cell? Intelligence + Design acting on matter = Life. Defense rests.
1. Genome Uses Two Languages Simultaneously; Try That Yourself Sometime, Why Don't You - Evolution News & Views
Another devastating blow to evolution. A recent study1 found 16 different special repair tasked enzymes in a cell called "Polymerase" that are assigned to repair your cell DNA. These bio-devices work around the clock in every cell repairing damaged or mutant DNA sections. So if evolution were true, why would it evolve a method of fixing genes, when it depends on "mutations" to effect this supposed upward complexity and change? Isn't that contradicting to the process? This finding completely undermines evolution! Their ultimate explanation; with enough time anything can happen! But rationally, who could imagine such a smart and complex system being self-made from mindlessness? See Evolution Falsified - Evolution Falsified I - Genesis Alive!
"Nearly 4,000 diseases are caused by mutations" in DNA. 2 So in truth, mutations are a very poor way to create new forms of life. Better done with Intelligence!"
Natural selection, i.e., the forces of nature, does not change the DNA of the individual animal at all, and can only change the total gene pool of a species by eliminating unfit individuals in some new environment generationally. "Natural selection only explains survival of the fittest; it fails to explain arrival of the fittest" - Dr. Barney Maddox Md 3. The DNA of all living things has a range of variability. designed in place. So as species move along in time and are exposed to varying conditions, they adapt and actually lose some DNA information, not gain it! This is actually designed in the genes, not from new information acquired from outside forces as time goes by. Darwin believed in the former,quoting "The Origin of Species" ;
"In North America the black bear was seen . . . swimming for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the water.... I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale." - Darwin
This concept has been long disproven in micro-biology long ago. So Darwin's understanding of how the cell works was flawed from the onset, allowing him to arrive at such a ridiculous conclusion. The issue of air breathing marine mammals has perplexed evolutionists for years. One must image some sort of animal like a hippo staying in the water so long its legs turned to flippers, nostrils migrated to the top of the head and added sonar to boot! (Not to mention thousands of other physiological changes! (This is actually the new explanation for Marine Mammal origin.) See our post - Design and the Migrators - Genesis Alive! Has anyone produced such half type? Evolutionists attempt to convince people that all these intermediates existed once but are now "missing". Concerning Origins, the basic rule of thumb is - believe what you see! Whale Evolution Video https://vimeo.com/235787390
So in the beginning we have pure genes in a particular Kind of animal, like birds for instance. Imagine the palm of your hand being the complete gene pool for a type of bird. Then in time and exposure to various outside factors, this Kind may branch out into species, like your fingers. In those instances genetic information is actually lost, but in many cases maybe recovered by cross-breeding 4 . In this way breeders recombine desired traits from other individual to obtain useful traits such as color, size, resilience to weather or even quality of meat. Such comes the term breeding. All this points to a wise Creator, not accident's as evolution insists.
1. Breakthrough for a DNA break-preventer
2. Nora, J. et al. 1994. Medical Genetics: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea and Feliger.
3. https://www.icr.org/article/3466/ Adapted from Mutations: The Raw Material for Evolution? by Barney Maddox, M.D
4. http://www.icr.org/article/7888/ Cross breeding
5. Whale Evolution? https://vimeo.com/235787390
"Nearly 4,000 diseases are caused by mutations" in DNA. 2 So in truth, mutations are a very poor way to create new forms of life. Better done with Intelligence!"
Natural selection, i.e., the forces of nature, does not change the DNA of the individual animal at all, and can only change the total gene pool of a species by eliminating unfit individuals in some new environment generationally. "Natural selection only explains survival of the fittest; it fails to explain arrival of the fittest" - Dr. Barney Maddox Md 3. The DNA of all living things has a range of variability. designed in place. So as species move along in time and are exposed to varying conditions, they adapt and actually lose some DNA information, not gain it! This is actually designed in the genes, not from new information acquired from outside forces as time goes by. Darwin believed in the former,quoting "The Origin of Species" ;
"In North America the black bear was seen . . . swimming for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the water.... I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale." - Darwin
This concept has been long disproven in micro-biology long ago. So Darwin's understanding of how the cell works was flawed from the onset, allowing him to arrive at such a ridiculous conclusion. The issue of air breathing marine mammals has perplexed evolutionists for years. One must image some sort of animal like a hippo staying in the water so long its legs turned to flippers, nostrils migrated to the top of the head and added sonar to boot! (Not to mention thousands of other physiological changes! (This is actually the new explanation for Marine Mammal origin.) See our post - Design and the Migrators - Genesis Alive! Has anyone produced such half type? Evolutionists attempt to convince people that all these intermediates existed once but are now "missing". Concerning Origins, the basic rule of thumb is - believe what you see! Whale Evolution Video https://vimeo.com/235787390
So in the beginning we have pure genes in a particular Kind of animal, like birds for instance. Imagine the palm of your hand being the complete gene pool for a type of bird. Then in time and exposure to various outside factors, this Kind may branch out into species, like your fingers. In those instances genetic information is actually lost, but in many cases maybe recovered by cross-breeding 4 . In this way breeders recombine desired traits from other individual to obtain useful traits such as color, size, resilience to weather or even quality of meat. Such comes the term breeding. All this points to a wise Creator, not accident's as evolution insists.
1. Breakthrough for a DNA break-preventer
2. Nora, J. et al. 1994. Medical Genetics: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea and Feliger.
3. https://www.icr.org/article/3466/ Adapted from Mutations: The Raw Material for Evolution? by Barney Maddox, M.D
4. http://www.icr.org/article/7888/ Cross breeding
5. Whale Evolution? https://vimeo.com/235787390
Evolution depends upon mistakes. It teaches that all life came from mutations..
When more powerful microscopes became available in the 1960's, an amazing finding was made; the discovery of the DNA coding strand by Dr. Francis Crick. (1) This strand of highly organized chemical units contained the coded technical instructions to build life on a chemical tape, directing the operation and work of the cell. This finding revolutionized man's understanding of life's complexity. The DNA triple base "life code" uses the same language in all living things, from amoeba to man, and is seen to be exactly the same since life first formed. This stasis of the code and mechanism is huge challenge to the concept of evolution, a theory that tout's the ability to change life forms quite prolifically! One should consider the contradiction of absolute stasis in cell operation compared the suggested amazing power of evolution, which claims from a single cell all life forms on Earth were derived. Does DNA(2) point to a common Super-Intelligence or better support the accidental probability of evolution? Evolution teaches that mistakes in the DNA plus natural selection makes progressively complex life forms, one after another, all by some unseen mindless hand, like getting Win 10 from Win 8 by accidents over time.
If evolution is true, shouldn't we observe this happening in the natural world today? If evolution isn't repeatable or observable, we can say evolution is 'falsified' scientifically. The DNA sequence strand stores a coding equivalent of over 2 Giga Bit of data in humans. That's equivalent to 1,000, 500 page books, or 12,000,000 words, and as mindless evolution demands, all acquired by chance.
Evolutions operation (or often called gradualism), depends completely on mutations, or random mistakes entering the genes causing change. After these changes, natural selection isolates the good traits and the life form moves forward. If this is true the DNA and cell mechanism should have changed along with it, and it has not. This means that the codes for all the different life forms must have been introduced at some critical point in the past. Biologists often refer to this as the Cambrian explosion (as seen entombed in the fossil record). If we open the Bible it would be defined as Creation.
It should be noted the worst diseases doctors treat today are caused by genetic mutations. Nearly 4,000 diseases caused by mutations in DNA. (3) So in truth, mutations are hardly a way to create new forms of life! Better done by Intelligence, as we know from experience!
3. Nora, J. et al. 1994. Medical Genetics: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea and Feliger
The current science establishment insists that all biological and natural sciences be framed in evolution as an absolute truth. As has been pointed out, this requires a faith in itself, similar to believing in God, but actually believing in nothingness, or, the random action of time on matter. Like any belief system based on faith, one should have some basis in fact or reason to "believe."
Back to the Watch..
So logic, fact and reason must be allowed to form ones beliefs about origin's, allowing all the evidence and possibilities to be presented. Does the existence of a watch require a watchmaker? In experience and reality the answer is a resounding Yes!
Conflicting Faiths?
Many in science and education are accusing people who discuss these ideas as "back-door evangelizing" and promoting a belief in God. But is this a valid argument regarding contrasting origins ideas? Obviously evolutionists have faith also, in time, mutations and the absence of intelligence acting on matter! That’s a belief system based on faith, often claiming to be "scientific" and other belief systems not, meaning any thought that a super intelligence acted on matter is automatically unscientific, as long as they leave out current advances in microbiology! See post The Question of Complexity - Genesis Alive!
So if one side says there's good reason to believe God did it by common sense and observation, that is just as valid a belief as any other, so such accusations are patently invalid and outside the realm of operational (testable, repeatable) science. A person should be able to say, "I believe God did this" and have just as strong a logical position concerning origins science as anyone who claims it came about without intelligence or God. It's amazing that science and education institutions all over America have the power to terminate any educator or professor who mentions or even suggests a Designer was involved in the origin of biological organisms. However, in the same moment if evolution is given credit, all is fine and their future secure. In this same context, evolutionary thinking is exhorted as the Father of Free and creative thought, but in truth it can be a dungeon of intolerance. Free thought is actually the Mother of Invention, and in order for science to progress, origins beliefs must be left at just that, an opinion about the past. If we can do so, our science and teaching institutions will flourish and attract greater thinkers, as people from all origins beliefs form dynamic free-thinking teams, moving our world closer to solving our larger issues.
One example of a working free-thinking team was that of scientist Norman Borlaug, who determined how to multiply the wheat production of the world, saving untold millions of lives from starvation in the "Green Revolution". He was no cynic - he had positive solutions and acted them out! It should be noted that in his Nobel award speech he quoted the Bible 5 times. Do you think he had diversity on his team?, of course he did! Do you think he would agree with the intolerant environment in science and education that exists today, absolutely not! What can we accomplish with tolerance and understanding? Where has this new intolerance got us today? The Soviet Union went down this same road and failed miserably, in a recent conference on origin's and discussing America's problem of institutional stereotyping in Russia, an enlightened scientist correctly summed it up when he stated; "Oh, now I understand, you're going where we're coming from!". Let's learn from their mistake's before it's too late. Thank you.
So origins beliefs should be a personal decision unrelated to ones intelligence, ability to teach, or work in science. Truth is truth and we should be free to appropriately express as such! It take's a pile of faith to imagine an ion motor or dual code or a cell came about from self-made nothingness, such a view is revealing of the core philosophy of many who embrace evolution as the only answer. Like a 747 or a Proton Motor, no one believes it formed itself, as reason and login often conflict with evolutionary faith.
When more powerful microscopes became available in the 1960's, an amazing finding was made; the discovery of the DNA coding strand by Dr. Francis Crick. (1) This strand of highly organized chemical units contained the coded technical instructions to build life on a chemical tape, directing the operation and work of the cell. This finding revolutionized man's understanding of life's complexity. The DNA triple base "life code" uses the same language in all living things, from amoeba to man, and is seen to be exactly the same since life first formed. This stasis of the code and mechanism is huge challenge to the concept of evolution, a theory that tout's the ability to change life forms quite prolifically! One should consider the contradiction of absolute stasis in cell operation compared the suggested amazing power of evolution, which claims from a single cell all life forms on Earth were derived. Does DNA(2) point to a common Super-Intelligence or better support the accidental probability of evolution? Evolution teaches that mistakes in the DNA plus natural selection makes progressively complex life forms, one after another, all by some unseen mindless hand, like getting Win 10 from Win 8 by accidents over time.
If evolution is true, shouldn't we observe this happening in the natural world today? If evolution isn't repeatable or observable, we can say evolution is 'falsified' scientifically. The DNA sequence strand stores a coding equivalent of over 2 Giga Bit of data in humans. That's equivalent to 1,000, 500 page books, or 12,000,000 words, and as mindless evolution demands, all acquired by chance.
Evolutions operation (or often called gradualism), depends completely on mutations, or random mistakes entering the genes causing change. After these changes, natural selection isolates the good traits and the life form moves forward. If this is true the DNA and cell mechanism should have changed along with it, and it has not. This means that the codes for all the different life forms must have been introduced at some critical point in the past. Biologists often refer to this as the Cambrian explosion (as seen entombed in the fossil record). If we open the Bible it would be defined as Creation.
It should be noted the worst diseases doctors treat today are caused by genetic mutations. Nearly 4,000 diseases caused by mutations in DNA. (3) So in truth, mutations are hardly a way to create new forms of life! Better done by Intelligence, as we know from experience!
3. Nora, J. et al. 1994. Medical Genetics: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lea and Feliger
The current science establishment insists that all biological and natural sciences be framed in evolution as an absolute truth. As has been pointed out, this requires a faith in itself, similar to believing in God, but actually believing in nothingness, or, the random action of time on matter. Like any belief system based on faith, one should have some basis in fact or reason to "believe."
Back to the Watch..
So logic, fact and reason must be allowed to form ones beliefs about origin's, allowing all the evidence and possibilities to be presented. Does the existence of a watch require a watchmaker? In experience and reality the answer is a resounding Yes!
Conflicting Faiths?
Many in science and education are accusing people who discuss these ideas as "back-door evangelizing" and promoting a belief in God. But is this a valid argument regarding contrasting origins ideas? Obviously evolutionists have faith also, in time, mutations and the absence of intelligence acting on matter! That’s a belief system based on faith, often claiming to be "scientific" and other belief systems not, meaning any thought that a super intelligence acted on matter is automatically unscientific, as long as they leave out current advances in microbiology! See post The Question of Complexity - Genesis Alive!
So if one side says there's good reason to believe God did it by common sense and observation, that is just as valid a belief as any other, so such accusations are patently invalid and outside the realm of operational (testable, repeatable) science. A person should be able to say, "I believe God did this" and have just as strong a logical position concerning origins science as anyone who claims it came about without intelligence or God. It's amazing that science and education institutions all over America have the power to terminate any educator or professor who mentions or even suggests a Designer was involved in the origin of biological organisms. However, in the same moment if evolution is given credit, all is fine and their future secure. In this same context, evolutionary thinking is exhorted as the Father of Free and creative thought, but in truth it can be a dungeon of intolerance. Free thought is actually the Mother of Invention, and in order for science to progress, origins beliefs must be left at just that, an opinion about the past. If we can do so, our science and teaching institutions will flourish and attract greater thinkers, as people from all origins beliefs form dynamic free-thinking teams, moving our world closer to solving our larger issues.
One example of a working free-thinking team was that of scientist Norman Borlaug, who determined how to multiply the wheat production of the world, saving untold millions of lives from starvation in the "Green Revolution". He was no cynic - he had positive solutions and acted them out! It should be noted that in his Nobel award speech he quoted the Bible 5 times. Do you think he had diversity on his team?, of course he did! Do you think he would agree with the intolerant environment in science and education that exists today, absolutely not! What can we accomplish with tolerance and understanding? Where has this new intolerance got us today? The Soviet Union went down this same road and failed miserably, in a recent conference on origin's and discussing America's problem of institutional stereotyping in Russia, an enlightened scientist correctly summed it up when he stated; "Oh, now I understand, you're going where we're coming from!". Let's learn from their mistake's before it's too late. Thank you.
So origins beliefs should be a personal decision unrelated to ones intelligence, ability to teach, or work in science. Truth is truth and we should be free to appropriately express as such! It take's a pile of faith to imagine an ion motor or dual code or a cell came about from self-made nothingness, such a view is revealing of the core philosophy of many who embrace evolution as the only answer. Like a 747 or a Proton Motor, no one believes it formed itself, as reason and login often conflict with evolutionary faith.
So can universal order in the natural world come about by accidents, chance and time, meaning all life came from mutations? Or more directly, teaching that this bird and you are a mutation? Who has any right to call you a mutant? That’s exactly the mechanism evolution has and promotes, it’s a degrading assertion that's absolutely False. See The Question of Human Origins - Genesis Alive!
In the realm of religion, the Bible does have a word for us;
"For since the Creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that man is without excuse."
Invisible qualities - Micro-sized Axial Proton powered motors, code systems and cells
Seen - see them with only the most powerful imaging sensors
Made - Intelligence acting on Matter
Without excuse - proof that a Watchmaker exists and has a taste in color as well!
Scientists who Reject Evolution;
A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution | Uncommon Descent
DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
Videos;
Myth of Junk DNA
Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 9 of 12) - YouTube
▶ Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 10 of 12) - YouTube
▶ How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle - YouTube
In the realm of religion, the Bible does have a word for us;
"For since the Creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that man is without excuse."
Invisible qualities - Micro-sized Axial Proton powered motors, code systems and cells
Seen - see them with only the most powerful imaging sensors
Made - Intelligence acting on Matter
Without excuse - proof that a Watchmaker exists and has a taste in color as well!
Scientists who Reject Evolution;
A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution | Uncommon Descent
DarwinAd4.qxd - 100ScientistsAd.pdf
Videos;
Myth of Junk DNA
Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 9 of 12) - YouTube
▶ Unlocking the Mystery of Life (Chapter 10 of 12) - YouTube
▶ How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle - YouTube